By Mark Kelly
Is it a mystery to anyone why societies don’t allow judges to appoint themselves?
Someone who thinks his superiority qualifies him to be a judge usually is the last person who should sit in judgment. A jurist like that – someone who actually knows the verdict in advance of the trial – will make decisions based only on the evidence that supports his preconceived opinion.
You can see this in virtually every criticism of Rick Warren that appears on the Internet.
For example, one criticizer pounced on what he perceived as a contradiction in Pastor Rick’s comments during the recent ABC/Nightline interview. Asked by the interviewer if there is a danger in “merging Christianity with psychology,” Rick was quoted as saying that, yes, there absolutely is a danger because psychology can feed self-centeredness, whereas the life-changing truth of the Bible is “It’s not about you.”
The criticizer writes: “Now, that's funny – if merging Christianity with psychology is dangerous because it feeds ‘self-centeredness,’ and Rick Warren claims ‘it's not about you,’ why did he ask the readers of his column in the March 2005 issue of the Ladies Home Journal, about their ‘wobbly self-esteem’ and then carefully teach both Christians and non-Christians alike that ‘the five truths that form the basis of a healthy self-image’ were: ‘Accept yourself, Love yourself, Be true to yourself, Forgive yourself, and Believe in yourself?’”
The judge is so eager to deliver his verdict that he misses the difference between “merging Christianity with psychology” and using psychological insight in light of God’s truth.
